tamsalama:

secondlina:

VALOR ENDS IN 24 HOURS!!

Valor is a comic anthology of re-imaged fairy tales showcasing the talent of some of the top creators in the field of digital comics. The purpose of this book is to pay homage to the strength, resourcefulness, and cunning of female heroines in fairy tales. Some of these are recreations of time-honored tales. Others are brand new stories, designed to be passed to future generations.

The anthology will be young adult friendly and in color. It will feature 17 comic stories and 4 prose stories. That’s more than 350 pages of new fairy tales! 

Click here to support this AWESOME anthology!

Holy crap it’s almost at 100,000 daaaaamn

If you love ladies starring in fairy tales and kicking ass with pretty colors go get your copy! 

330 notes   •   September 02 2014, 07:12 AM   •   VIA   •   SOURCE
936 notes   •   September 02 2014, 06:45 AM   •   VIA   •   SOURCE
170 notes   •   September 02 2014, 06:18 AM   •   VIA   •   SOURCE
fuckyeahmangaboys:

>.>

fuckyeahmangaboys:

>.>

Wait… Aren’t I too perfect? Aren’t I an awesome chic?!

Yuzuki Seo
264 notes   •   September 02 2014, 04:57 AM   •   VIA   •   SOURCE

Language Police

racismschool:

This is a systematically encouraged way to stop engaging in a conversation when you know you are going to lose the argument. Once you have started your policing, you can then blame the other person for being “Angry” or “Not nice.” If your entire point of contention is that of a kind word, you should never engage with anyone, anywhere, at any time. 

Language policing is a trick used by the weak minded. Nothing more. Nothing less.

This is easily provable. Keep an eye on discussions that cross your dash. Note the next time someone does some form of Language Policing. Did they do it near the beginning of the conversation and make their rules of engagement clear? No, it’s far more likely that they were in the belief that they were correct in whatever their view point. Once it was challenged and on it’s way to being proven false, the policing appeared. 

I see several problems with Language Policing:

  • Who sets these rules?
  • If the rules are not mutually agreed upon by all parties, the rules are null and void.
  • Language policing implies that a person’s point is somehow less valid if said in a tone or in a phrase that someone else deems unacceptable. 
  • Anger does not stop truth from being true. Nor do angry words, loud voices or the Caps Lock key. 

Language Policing implies that one person is on a higher level than another based solely on wording. You can not claim to want to engage in discourse while announcing that you are better than those that oppose you. You can not have a conversation, one that you deem “Civil” or otherwise, while also believing that you somehow have the intellectual high ground based on nothing more than a turn of phrase.

As a matter of fact, I tend to believe the opposite true.  Language policing seems to encompass one of two justifications. One, that a person will somehow be more willing to accept what you are saying if you say it with a smile. Two, that anger is a sign of a lessor being and because of this, that person no longer deserves your “Time.”

An actual intellectual can make their point. Period. No matter your word usage, no matter your kindness or anger. A person that has an actual point, can make it no matter their opposition or the tone their opposition uses. Facts, opinions and even judgments are no more or less valid or invalid if said with a “Fuck you” attached. 

If you were to smile and kindly tell me that I am pretty while also hitting me in the face with a wooden bat, my nose wouldn’t be any less broken. Any pain caused, wouldn’t be lessened and my anger wouldn’t be any less valid because you were “Nice” while you did it. 

Kindness does not eliminate truth. Anger does not eliminate truth.

If you find that you need a person to speak to you in a specific way in order to converse with them at all, you should make that known before you get into any discourse. That way, when the person reminds you that you do not get to dictate actions or emotions, you will know that this person is not someone you can control and you can move on to someone who will fall for your act.

That is what it’s about after all. Control. Your need to “Police” language is an effort to make your opposition seem “Less than” while setting yourself up as the “All knowing” director of the conversation. You are trying to force your way into having the upper hand. If your point is a valid one, you won’t need to police anyone, ever.

No one person get’s this power over another. If you feel you deserve this, you should remove yourself from all verbal/written human contact. 

522 notes   •   September 02 2014, 04:37 AM   •   VIA   •   SOURCE

"I’m supposed to admire this guy, just like the protagonist. And he’s handsome, smart, great at sports and kind, isn’t that right? Then why doesn’t Senpai like me?”

623 notes   •   September 02 2014, 04:30 AM   •   VIA   •   SOURCE

wolvesofcolor:

juvjuvychan:

mzminola:

hungrylikethewolfie:

I just need, like, a million fics featuring Stiles trying really hard to be bros with Boyd, and Boyd just sort of blandly tolerating him.

#everytime Boyd says they’re not friends #he’s like #SOON

all i see is

18,988 notes   •   September 02 2014, 04:20 AM   •   VIA   •   SOURCE
131 notes   •   September 02 2014, 04:03 AM   •   VIA   •   SOURCE